This book contains important and significant findings of theoretical and empirical studies by many
eminent researchers all over the world and is composed of fourteen chapters.
The first three chapters study firms’ strategic decisions based on the economic theory of profitmaximizing
Chapter 1 examines the two-part pricing problem of a risk-neutral monopoly (the seller) for a good
sold to buyers who face uncertainty about their demand for the good. The chapter shows that the
optimal unit price is higher or lower than the constant marginal cost, depending on the nature of
the good (normal or inferior) and on the signs of cross-derivatives of buyers’ multivariate utility
function. This chapter employs a quasi-linear specification that reduces the general multivariate
utility function to a special univariate utility function, and shows that the seller optimally raises
(lowers) the unit price and lowers (raises) the fixed fee from their risk-neutral counterparts if
buyers’ total and marginal benefits are positively (negatively) correlated. The chapter further
shows that these results are robust to the introduction of competition to the seller.
Chapter 2 considers oligopoly markets comprising profit-maximizing firms. There is a vast
literature on non-cooperative oligopoly games. In this literature, however, the discount rates have
been considered as fixed. Consequently, this chapter aims at understanding the effects of
uncertainty over future discount rates on collusive behavior. Results indicate that the more
uncertain the future discount rates are, the more collusive firms become. A higher average
discount rate, on the other hand, is anti-collusive. With this kind of information at hand, policies
that are targeted at reducing the variability in interest rates can promote competitive behavior by
discouraging firms to behave collusively. Thus, the results can be of use for competition
authorities and governmental bodies.
Chapter 3 addresses firms’ strategic decisions on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), focusing
on the role of market structure and firm size as drivers of CSR. Do large firms invest more in
CSR? Do firms in more concentrated markets invest more in CSR? A simple theoretical model
with product and CSR competition is presented. This chapter finds that more competition
increases the CSR investment and that the firm size also positively influences firms’ social
responsibility. Size and market concentration thus contribute in different directions to CSR, which
contradicts the usually presumed positive association between these variables.
Chapters 4-9 investigate not only the behavior of profit-maximizing capitalist firms but also the
behavior of labor-managed, joint-stock and state-owned firms.
Chapter 4 characterizes the socially optimal mix of firms in a duopoly with both profit-seeking and
labor-managed firms. Firms’ activities generate a twofold externality: (i) production entails the
exploitation of a common pool natural resource and (ii) production/consumption pollutes the
environment. This chapter shows that it is always preferable to have at least one labor-managed
firm in the industry, in view of its softer impact on environmental magnitudes. Moreover, if
market size is large enough, a mixed duopoly is indeed the socially efficient industry
Chapter 5 examines a two-stage game model of duopoly between a labor-managed firm and a
joint-stock firm. The following situation is considered. In stage one, each firm independently decides whether or not to offer lifetime employment. In stage two, each firm independently
chooses its actual output. The chapter shows that only the labor-managed firm offers lifetime
employment and at equilibrium, both firms are more profitable than in the simultaneous quantitysetting
game without lifetime employment.
Chapter 6 examines a market comprising a labor-managed firm, a capitalist firm and a state-owned
firm. The following situation is considered. In stage one, the capitalist firm and the labor-managed
firm are allowed to install capacity. In stage two, the state-owned firm is allowed to install
capacity. None of the firms can reduce or dispose of capacity. In stage three, the firms
simultaneously and independently choose output. The chapter demonstrates that there is a
subgame perfect equilibrium in which only the labor-managed firm installs excess capacity as a
Chapter 7 examines the strategic interaction of two countries’ optimal choices of privatization and
trade policies with different combinations of production subsidy and import tariff, and find some
interesting policy implications. First, a higher social welfare can be achieved with the appropriate
degree of privatization when both governments adopt a production subsidy only. Second, the free
trade agreement can work as a coordination device to solve the prisoner’s dilemma problem.
Third, the maximum-revenue privatization, combined with zero subsidy and higher tariff, is higher
than optimum-welfare privatization. Finally, the international bilateral equilibrium needs less
degree of privatization and lower subsidy rate, even though it is jointly suboptimal from the
viewpoint of global welfare.
Chapter 8 answers the following question: Will the order of public firm’s moves affect the social
efficiency of free entry in a mixed oligopoly market? This chapter first shows that in a closed
economy, private entry is socially excessive regardless of the firm’s order of move. The chapter
then shows that in an open economy, socially excessive of domestic private entry remains hold
regardless of the firm’s order of move if the trade cost of foreign competitors is higher enough to
deter foreign entry. The excessive entry results found in the presence of public firm and market
leaders have important implications for anti-competitive regulation policy and policy coordination
between domestic and foreign governments.
Chapter 9 investigates a mixed duopoly market in which a state-owned public firm competes on
price against a foreign private firm. Each firm decides whether or not to hire a manager. The
chapter demonstrates that there is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium in which only the foreign
private firm hires a manager. This is in contrast with the case in which the state-owned firm
competes against a domestic private firm, where both firms hire managers.
Chapters 10-14 make important empirical contributions.
Chapter 10 examines the conundrums of avoidance of possible internet-based crimes (cyber
crimes) against critical infrastructures. Critical infrastructure is an important element of the
modern world: Every nation must defend the crucial government, transportation, financial, energy,
information, and other critical infrastructure systems against terrorist attacks and earthy
cataclysms. Information security occupies a special place in the list of human priorities. One of the
primary objectives of this chapter is to prove the relevance of the problem, as well as describe
probable phenomena and movements that could form a topic for further discussions and
considerations in this area. The chapter’s main issue is the most vital due to the extreme
dependability of financial bodies in the modern world that help accelerate the globalization
processes involving the economies of all countries.
Chapter 11 uses the data envelopment analysis and Malmquist index, and analyzes how the
Uruguay Round’s resolution on Agreement on Agriculture, which is a strategic decision making at
the global level, has contributed to the strategic decision making in Asian agriculture at the
national level. The empirical results reveal that the strategic decision making of trade liberalization
at the national level has significantly contributed to growth in productivity and efficiency
measures in Asian agriculture during the period of 1981 to 2012. Like the Kuznets hypothesis, an
interesting inverted U-shaped movement of technical efficiency levels with trade liberalization has
been observed, while the movement of technological change on trade openness comes as Ushaped.
Chapter 12 confirms that green human resource management (GHRM) significantly moderates the
relationship of employees’ green behaviours with environmental sustainability. Organisations
around the world are shifting from processes that exploit the environment towards those that are
environmentally friendly. Going forward, researchers predict more research will illuminate the role
of GHRM activities in enhancing and perhaps even driving environmental management initiatives.
Such research reduces organisational degradation and contributes to the benefits of all stakeholders
in the future.
Chapter 13 is an attempt to empirically examine the relationship between firm size and exportintensities
of manufacturing firms in India in a discriminating oligopoly model. Using the unit
level factory level data for the Indian economy for the year of 2009 from the Annual Survey of
Industries, the chapter tests the propositions (1) firm level output and the marginal cost of the firm
and (2) export share of the firm and the firm size being measured in terms of the fixed capital
assets held by the firm. The chapter further examines if transport advantage in terms of costal
location of the firms has any impact on the firm export.
Chapter 14 investigates how industrial economics modeling can be particularly useful to analyze
development issues in the context of food safety regulations. The chapter shows how such a
modeling is necessary to understand, in such a context, the evolution of vertical relations in the
South supply chains, the mechanism of price formation in less-developed economies subject to
food safety constraints, the evolution of supply (quantitatively and qualitatively), the food risk, etc.
To answer the specific economic development issues associated with such a context, the chapter
shows that it is necessary to revisit and modify the usual theoretical frameworks of industrial
economics to take account of the multitude of actors in the supply chains, the multitude of
typologies of marketing channels and the resulting strategic interactions.
Finally, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors who have contributed to the
chapters. I would also like to thank the staff members of Bentham Science Publishers, particularly
Ms. Fariya Zulfiqar for the kind support and help.
Institute for Basic Economic Science