Chapter 3

Habermas’s Domains of Reflection and Discursive Acts

Reuben M. Castagno

Abstract

In order to assess the different varieties of educators’ cinematic reflective practices, the researcher made use of the subjects’ cinematic journals, cinematic essays, and the planning of a classroom cinematic learning experiences. The researcher conducted a “document content analysis”, a widely used method in qualitative inquiry (Frankel & Wallen, 1993). The basis of analysis was the unit of educators’ conceptual thinking on the connection of popular cinema to pedagogy. A thought unit in this study was defined as the written entry indicating a repeatable discernible segment of a reflective claim regarding the self (i.e., the speaker/writer), the other(s), and/or a combination of the speaker and the other presenting something inter-subjective).

Total Pages: 25-35 (11)

Purchase Chapter  Book Details

RELATED BOOKS

.Reshaping Universities for Survival in the 21st Century: New Opportunities and Paradigms.
.Inside the New University: Prerequisites for a Contemporary Knowledge Production.
.Supervising and Writing a Good Undergraduate Dissertation.